Thursday, October 1, 2015

Jordan is Arab-Palestine r3 - YJ Draiman


Jordan is Arab-Palestine



Jordan is a country that never existed in history before WWI and nobody is contesting its legitimacy or territorial sovereignty and control. Jordan's territory was taken from land allocated to the Jewish people under international law and treaties and signed by the 1919 Faisal Weitzmann Agreement. The amount of land taken away from the Jewish people for Jordan is about 78% from the total original allocation under the San Remo treaty of 75,000 sq. miles or 120,000 sq. km. The Arabs received over 5 million sq. miles. The same powers that established 21 Arab States after WWI, which nobody is contesting either, had established the State of Israel in 1920 based on the 1917 Balfour Declaration. On the other hand, Israel and its Jewish people have over 3500 year history. Many Nations and people are questioning Israel's control of its liberated territory. No one is mentioning that the Arab countries had terrorized and ejected over a million Jewish families from their lands; where many of the Jews have lived for over 2,400 years, the Arabs confiscated all their assets, businesses, homes and over 120,000 sq. km. of real property which is valued in the trillions of dollars. (That includes property and land east of the Jordan River which is now the State of Jordan and no Jews are permitted to live in Jordan. Most of these expelled Jewish families and their children are resettled in Greater Israel they constitute today over half the population of Israel.
If this is not discrimination against
Israel, I do not know what is.
It seems like nobody cares about land violations in other countries in the world, but when it comes to
Israel, everyone has a say. Israel's rights in the treaty of San Remo of 1920 are in affect in perpetuity, it clearly states that the Jewish people are the only ones with political rights in the British Mandate of Palestine and that the Jewish people can live anywhere in the British Mandate for Palestine aka Israel. The UN has no authority to redraw and or recreate countries, it can only recommend and if the recommendation is not accepted by all parties, it has no binding affect and no validity or meaning whatsoever.
If the
U.S., Europe and other countries will stop meddling, and stop its criticism and involvement in the politics of Israel and the Arabs, than there will be a chance for peace.
We know the great powers are only interested in the OIL and nothing else, that is the bottom line.
In fact sovereignty of the Jews over Palestine West of the
Jordan is supported five ways:
1. By the grant of the WWI Allies of exclusive political rights to
Palestine in trust to World Jewry on April 25, 1920, intended to vest when the Jews in Palestine had attained a population majority. Prior to that time, England abandoned its trusteeship as the mandatory power, and de jure sovereignty devolved to the Jews who attained a majority not long afterwards in 1950 from the immigration of all the Jews in the Middle East who were dispossessed of their homes where they and their ancestors had lived for centuries.
2. In the opinion of world acclaimed International Lawyers Julius Stone and Steven Schwebel based on
Jordan's conquest of Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem in an aggressive war and their liberation by Israel in a defensive war.
3. Under US and
UK treaty law based on the Anglo American Convention of 1924.
4. In the historic way sovereignty was gained, by asserting Israeli sovereignty in 1948 and defending its territory with its blood and treasure, establishing control and stability over its claimed territory.
5. Under Canon law by a gift from God, as shown in the Old Testament.
YJ Draiman

"No Jew is entitled to give up the right of establishing [i.e. settling] the Jewish Nation in all of the
Land of Israel. No Jewish body has such power. Not even all the Jews alive today [i.e. the entire Jewish People] have the power to cede any part of the country or homeland whatsoever. This is a right vouchsafed or reserved for the Jewish Nation throughout all generations. This right cannot be lost or expropriated under any condition or circumstance. Even if at some particular time, there are those who declare that they are relinquishing this right, they have no power or competence to deprive coming generations of this right. The Jewish nation is neither bound nor governed by such a waiver or renunciation. Our right to the whole of this country is valid, in force and endures forever. And until the Final Redemption has come, we will not budge from this historic right."
BEN-GURION'S DECLARATION ON THE EXCLUSIVE AND
INALIENABLE JEWISH RIGHT TO THE WHOLE OF
THE LAND OF ISRAEL:
at the Basle Session of the 20th Zionist Congress at
Zurich (1937)


7 comments:

  1. The world at large must compare how Israel with very limited resources, uplifted and resettled the expelled and dispossessed Million JEWISH REFUGEES FROM ARAB COUNTRIES who lost land totaling more than 6 times the size of Israel valued in the trillions of dollars with 68 years of Arab manipulation of a much lower number of Arab refugees. Mahmoud Abbas' aka Abu Mazen stance on refugees makes a mockery of a two state solution, which will never happen. The Arabs have Jordan as the Palestinian state which is on historical Jewish land. It denies the rights of the million Jewish refugees from the Arab countries. It sidesteps Arab culpability for starting the wars that led to BOTH refugee issues. And it runs counter to the way every other population exchange has been resolved. They have to consider relocating to Jordan and or to the homes and the 75,000 sq. mi. of Jewish lands the Arabs confiscated from the expelled Jewish people. The Arabs have 21 States with over 5 million sq. mi. where they must resettle the Arab refugees , Israel has only one small one.
    "No country in the world exists today by virtue of its 'right'.
    All countries exist today by virtue of their ability to defend themselves against those who seek their destruction."

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Any Jew that thinks all the land of Israel does not belongs to the Jews has a choice to leave Israel. Is it not enough that the Arabs/Muhammad killed and raped the Jews in Medina which was a Jewish city going back thousands of years, and the Arab countries terrorized and expelled over a million Jewish families and confiscated all their assets including homes and over 75,000 sq. mi. of Jewish owned land for thousands of years. Those expelled Jewish families and their children now live in Greater Israel. Death to all terrorists is a must, no merci.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Any Jew that thinks all the land of Israel does not belongs to the Jews has a choice to leave Israel. Is it not enough that the Arabs/Muhammad killed and raped the Jews in Medina which was a Jewish city going back thousands of years, and the Arab countries terrorized and expelled over a million Jewish families and confiscated all their assets including homes and over 75,000 sq. mi. of Jewish owned land for thousands of years. Those expelled Jewish families and their children now live in Greater Israel. Death to all terrorists is a must, no merci.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Arabs do not belong in Greater Israel. They have over 12 million sq. km. they received after WWI, they have Jordan which is Jewish territory and they have the homes and over 120,000 sq. km. of land the Arab countries confiscated when they terrorized and expelled over a million Jewish families who now reside in Israel. When you practice hate, terror and violence, I do not want you near me. Arabs get out now out of Israel, that includes the silent majority, that by not objecting they become complicit to the violence.
    Any Jew that thinks all the land of Israel does not belongs to the Jews has a choice to leave Israel. Is it not enough that the Arabs/Muhammad killed and raped the Jews in Medina which was a Jewish city going back thousands of years, and the Arab countries terrorized and expelled over a million Jewish families and confiscated all their assets including homes and over 75,000 sq. mi. of Jewish owned land for thousands of years. Those expelled Jewish families and their children now live in Greater Israel. Death to all terrorists is a must, no mercy. The Arabs also have Jordan which is Jewish territory established as the new Arab state for the Arabs in Palestine.
    The Oslo Accords are null and void as Stated by Abbas at the UN in the summer of 2015. The Arab/Palestinians never abided by its terms and never intended to abide by its terms. It was a deceptive way to get control of the territory as a prelude to commit terror and take over the rest of Israel. The best example you have is the terrorist state in Gaza and the increased terror and violence from the Arabs in Judea and Samaria aka The West Bank. The Arab/Palestinian state was created in Jordan which is on Jewish territory. All the territory west of the Jordan River must be taken back under Israeli control. That includes Gush Katif and all the Jewish communities in the Gaza Strip vacated by Israel Ariel Sharon in 2005. The Arab PA must be dismantled.
    YJ Draiman

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Partition Plan: The Soviet Position on Partition

    Category » The Partition Plan
    Reference
    Background & Overview
    Partition Plan
    General Assembly Scorecard for Partition Vote
    Historical Partition Plans
    United Nations
    Partition Resolution (UNGA Res. 181)
    UN Vote
    UN Vote
    General Assembly Scorecard for Partition Vote
    UN Paper On Control Of Immigration Under Partition
    UN Special Committee on Palestine Recommendations
    UNSCOP’s Majority Proposal
    UNSCOP’s Minority Proposal
    United Nations Debate on Partition
    Official Positions
    Arab League Position
    The American Position
    Truman Letter Before Partition Vote
    Truman Letter on Enforcing Partition
    U.S. Proposes Temporary Trusteeship
    Truman Statement on Trusteeship
    British Government Policy Statement Against Partition
    British Government Statement of Policy on the Partition of Palestine
    The Soviet Position

    The Partition Plan:
    Table of Contents
    |
    Background & Overview
    |
    Resolution 181
    After the British decided to bring the Palestine issue to the UN, Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin's adviser on Palestine asked a representative of the Jewish Agency why the Jews agreed to let the UN decide the fate of Palestine. "Don't you know," he said, "that the only way a Jewish state will be established is if the U.S. and Soviet Union agree? Nothing like that ever happened. It cannot possibly happen. It will never happen."

    In May 1947, however, Soviet delegate Andrei Gromyko said:

    The fact that no Western European State has been able to ensure the defense of the elementary rights of the Jewish people and to safeguard it against the violence of the fascist executioners explains the aspirations of the Jews to establish their own State. It would be unjust not to take this into consideration and to deny the right of the Jewish people to realize this aspiration.
    A few months later, the Soviet Union backed partition and, subsequently, became the second nation to recognize Israel. Ironically, the Arabs never blamed the Soviets for their initial pro­Israel policy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. No Arab-Palestinian state west of the Jordan River
    If you read the 1917 Balfour Declaration (Which emulated Napoleons 1799 letter to the Jewish community in Palestine promising that The National Home for The Jewish people will be reestablished in Palestine, as the Jews are the rightful owners). Nowhere does it state an Arab entity west of The Jordan River. The San Remo Conference of 1920 does not state an Arab entity west of The Jordan River, confirmed by Article 95 in the 1920 Treaty of Sevres. The Mandate for Palestine terms does not state an Arab entity west of the Jordan River. It specifically states a Jewish National Home in Palestine without limiting the Jewish territory in Palestine. It also states that the British should work with the Jewish Agency as the official representative of the Jews in Palestine to implement the National Home of the Jewish people in Palestine. I stress again; nowhere does it state that an Arab entity should be implemented west of the Jordan River.
    As a matter of historical record, The British reallocated over 77% of Jewish Palestine to the Arab-Palestinians in 1922 with specific borders and Jordan took over additional territory like the Gulf of Aqaba which was not part of the allocation to Jordan.

    No where in any of the above stated agreements does it provides for an Arab entity west of the Jordan River. The U.N. resolutions are non-binding with no legal standing, same applies to the ICJ. The Oslo Accords are null and void.

    It is time to relocate the Arabs in Israel to Jordan and to the homes and the 120,000 sq. km. the Arab countries confiscated from the over a million Jewish families that they terrorized and expelled and those expelled Jews were resettled in Israel. They can use the trillions of dollars in reparations for the Jewish assets to finance the relocation of the Arabs and help set-up an economy and industry instead of living on the world charity.
    YJ Draiman

    ReplyDelete